Pubblicazioni - Garascia Dott. Andrea

• Fulminant Versus Acute Nonfulminant Myocarditis in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.
  J Am Coll Cardiol

  2019 Jul;74(3):299-311. doi: S0735-1097(19)35290-8.
  
  Ammirati Enrico, Veronese Giacomo, Brambatti Michela, Merlo Marco, Cipriani Manlio, Potena Luciano, Sormani Paola, Aoki Tatsuo, Sugimura Koichiro, Sawamura Akinori, Okumura Takahiro, Pinney Sean, Hong Kimberly, Shah Palak, Braun Öscar, Van de Heyning Caroline M, Montero Santiago, Petrella Duccio, Huang Florent, Schmidt Matthieu, Raineri Claudia, Lala Anuradha, Varrenti Marisa, Foà Alberto, Leone Ornella, Gentile Piero, Artico Jessica, Agostini Valentina, Patel Rajiv, Garascia Andrea, Van Craenenbroeck Emeline M, Hirose Kaoru, Isotani Akihiro, Murohara Toyoaki, Arita Yoh, Sionis Alessandro, Fabris Enrico, Hashem Sherin, Garcia-Hernando Victor, Oliva Fabrizio, Greenberg Barry, Shimokawa Hiroaki, Sinagra Gianfranco, Adler Eric D, Frigerio Maria, Camici Paolo G
  
  Abstract
  
  BACKGROUND:
  Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a form of acute myocarditis characterized by severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction requiring inotropes and/or mechanical circulatory support. A single-center study found that a patient with FM had better outcomes than those with acute nonfulminant myocarditis (NFM) presenting with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, but otherwise hemodynamically stable. This was recently challenged, so disagreement still exists.
  
  OBJECTIVES:
  This study sought to provide additional evidence on the outcome of FM and to ascertain whether patient stratification based on the main histologic subtypes can provide additional prognostic information.
  
  METHODS:
  A total of 220 patients (median age 42 years, 46.3% female) with histologically proven acute myocarditis (onset of symptoms <30 days) all presenting with left ventricular systolic dysfunction were included in a retrospective, international registry comprising 16 tertiary hospitals in the United States, Europe, and Japan. The main endpoint was the occurrence of cardiac death or heart transplantation within 60 days from admission and at long-term follow-up.
  
  RESULTS:
  Patients with FM (n = 165) had significantly higher rates of cardiac death and heart transplantation compared with those with NFM (n = 55), both at 60 days (28.0% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.0001) and at 7-year follow-up (47.7% vs. 10.4%, p < 0.0001). Using Cox multivariate analysis, the histologic subtype emerged as a further variable affecting the outcome in FM patients, with giant cell myocarditis having a significantly worse prognosis compared with eosinophilic and lymphocytic myocarditis. In a subanalysis including only adults with lymphocytic myocarditis, the main endpoints occurred more frequently in FM compared with in NFM both at 60 days (19.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.005) and at 7-year follow up (41.4% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.0004).
  
  CONCLUSIONS:
  This international registry confirms that patients with FM have higher rates of cardiac death and heart transplantation both in the short- and long-term compared with patients with NFM. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the histologic subtype of FM carries independent prognostic value, highlighting the need for timely endomyocardial biopsy in this condition.
  
  Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Recurrent cardiac sarcoidosis after heart transplantation.
  Clin Res Cardiol

  2019 May;():. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01485-z.
  
  Veronese Giacomo, Cipriani Manlio, Petrella Duccio, Geniere Nigra Stefano, Pedrotti Patrizia, Garascia Andrea, Masciocco Gabriella, Bramerio Manuela A, Klingel Karin, Frigerio Maria, Ammirati Enrico
  
  
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Cardiogenic shock: old and new circulatory assist devices: the role of counter-pulsation.
  Eur Heart J Suppl

  2019 Mar;21(Suppl B):B59-B60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suz020.
  
  Viola Giovanna, Morici Nuccia, Sacco Alice, Stucchi Miriam, Brunelli Dario, Cipriani Manlio, Garascia Andrea, Bottiroli Maurizio, Frigerio Maria, Oliva Fabrizio
  
  
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Acute and Fulminant Myocarditis: a Pragmatic Clinical Approach to Diagnosis and Treatment.
  Curr Cardiol Rep

  2018 09;20(11):114. doi: 10.1007/s11886-018-1054-z.
  
  Ammirati Enrico, Veronese Giacomo, Cipriani Manlio, Moroni Francesco, Garascia Andrea, Brambatti Michela, Adler Eric D, Frigerio Maria
  
  Abstract
  
  PURPOSE OF REVIEW:
  To review the clinical features of acute myocarditis, including its fulminant presentation, and present a pragmatic approach to the diagnosis and treatment, considering indications of American and European Scientific Statements and recent data derived by large contemporary registries.
  
  RECENT FINDINGS:
  Patients presenting with acute uncomplicated myocarditis (i.e., without left ventricular dysfunction, heart failure, or ventricular arrhythmias) have a favorable short- and long-term prognosis: these findings do not support the indication to endomyocardial biopsy in this clinical scenario. Conversely, patients with complicated presentations, especially those with fulminant myocarditis, require an aggressive and comprehensive management, including endomyocardial biopsy and availability of advanced therapies for circulatory support. Although several immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapies have been studied and are actually prescribed in the real-world practice, their effectiveness has not been clearly demonstrated. Patients with specific histological subtypes of acute myocarditis (i.e., giant cell and eosinophilic myocarditis) or those affected by sarcoidosis or systemic autoimmune disorders seem to benefit most from immunosuppression. On the other hand, no clear evidence supports the use of immunosuppressive agents in patients with lymphocytic acute myocarditis, even though small series suggest a potential benefit. Acute myocarditis is a heterogeneous condition with distinct pathophysiological pathways. Further research is mandatory to identify factors and mechanisms that may trigger/maintain or counteract/repair the myocardial damage, in order to provide a rational for future evidence-based treatment of patients affected by this condition.
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Management of cardiogenic shock in acute decompensated chronic heart failure: The ALTSHOCK phase II clinical trial.
  Am Heart J

  2018 10;204():196-201. doi: S0002-8703(18)30217-5.
  
  Morici Nuccia, Oliva Fabrizio, Ajello Silvia, Stucchi Miriam, Sacco Alice, Cipriani Manlio Gianni, De Bonis Michele, Garascia Andrea, Gagliardone Maria Pia, Melisurgo Giulio, Russo Claudio Francesco, La Vecchia Carlo, Frigerio Maria, Pappalardo Federico
  
  Abstract
  
  Management of acute decompensated heart failure patients presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) is not straightforward, as few data are available from clinical trials. Stabilization before left ventricle assist device (LVAD) or heart transplantation (HTx) is strongly advocated, as patients undergoing LVAD implant or HTx in critical status have worse outcomes. This was a multicenter phase II study with a Simon 2-stage design, including 24 consecutive patients treated with low-moderate epinephrine doses, whose refractory CS prompted implantation of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) which was subsequently upgraded with peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. At admission, patients had severe left ventricular dysfunction and overt CS, 7 patients could be managed only with inotropic therapy, and 16 patients were transitioned to IABP and 1 to IABP and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; the median duration of epinephrine therapy was 7?days (interquartile range 6-15), and the median dose was 0.08 ?g/kg/min (interquartile range 0.05-0.1); 21 patients (87.5%) survived at 60?days (primary outcome); among them, 13 (61.9%) underwent LVAD implantation, 2 (9.5%) underwent HTx, and 6 (28.6%) improved on medical treatment, indicating that early and intensive treatment of CS in chronic advanced heart failure patients with low-dose epinephrine and timely short-term mechanical circulatory support leads to satisfactory outcomes.
  
  Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Not every fulminant lymphocytic myocarditis fully recovers.
  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)

  2018 Aug;19(8):453-454. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000664.
  
  Veronese Giacomo, Cipriani Manlio, Petrella Duccio, Pedrotti Patrizia, Giannattasio Cristina, Garascia Andrea, Oliva Fabrizio, Klingel Karin, Frigerio Maria, Ammirati Enrico
  
  
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Survival and Left Ventricular Function Changes in Fulminant Versus Nonfulminant Acute Myocarditis.
  Circulation

  2017 Aug;136(6):529-545. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.026386.
  
  Ammirati Enrico, Cipriani Manlio, Lilliu Marzia, Sormani Paola, Varrenti Marisa, Raineri Claudia, Petrella Duccio, Garascia Andrea, Pedrotti Patrizia, Roghi Alberto, Bonacina Edgardo, Moreo Antonella, Bottiroli Maurizio, Gagliardone Maria P, Mondino Michele, Ghio Stefano, Totaro Rossana, Turazza Fabio M, Russo Claudio F, Oliva Fabrizio, Camici Paolo G, Frigerio Maria
  
  Abstract
  
  BACKGROUND:
  Previous reports have suggested that despite their dramatic presentation, patients with fulminant myocarditis (FM) might have better outcome than those with acute nonfulminant myocarditis (NFM). In this retrospective study, we report outcome and changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a large cohort of patients with FM compared with patients with NFM.
  
  METHODS:
  The study population consists of 187 consecutive patients admitted between May 2001 and November 2016 with a diagnosis of acute myocarditis (onset of symptoms <1 month) of whom 55 required inotropes and/or mechanical circulatory support (FM) and the remaining 132 were hemodynamically stable (NFM). We also performed a subanalysis in 130 adult patients with acute viral myocarditis and viral prodrome within 2 weeks from the onset, which includes 34 with FM and 96 with NFM. Patients with giant-cell myocarditis, eosinophilic myocarditis, or cardiac sarcoidosis and those <15 years of age were excluded from the subanalysis.
  
  RESULTS:
  In the whole population (n=187), the rate of in-hospital death or heart transplantation was 25.5% versus 0% in FM versus NFM, respectively (<0.0001). Long-term heart transplantation-free survival at 9 years was lower in FM than NFM (64.5% versus 100%, log-rank <0.0001). Despite greater improvement in LVEF during hospitalization in FM versus NFM forms (median, 32% [interquartile range, 20%-40%] versus 3% [0%-10%], respectively; <0.0001), the proportion of patients with LVEF <55% at last follow-up was higher in FM versus NFM (29% versus 9%; relative risk, 3.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-7.64, =0.003). Similar results for survival and changes in LVEF in FM versus NFM were observed in the subgroup (n=130) with viral myocarditis. None of the patients with NFM and LVEF ?55% at discharge had a significant decrease in LVEF at follow-up.
  
  CONCLUSIONS:
  Patients with FM have an increased mortality and need for heart transplantation compared with those with NFM. From a functional viewpoint, patients with FM have a more severely impaired LVEF at admission that, despite steep improvement during hospitalization, remains lower than that in patients with NFM at long-term follow-up. These findings also hold true when only the viral forms are considered and are different from previous studies showing better prognosis in FM.
  
  © 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• [Psychological evaluation and support in patients with left ventricular assist devices: preliminary data at 6-month follow-up].
  G Ital Cardiol (Rome)

  2016 Nov;17(11):940-946. doi: 10.1714/2498.26204.
  
  Voltolini Alessandra, Minotti Anna, Verde Alessandro, Cipriani Manlio, Garascia Andrea, Turazza Fabio, Macera Francesca, Perna Enrico, Russo Claudio F, Fumagalli Emilia, Frigerio Maria
  
  Abstract
  
  BACKGROUND:
  Heart disease has an impact on patient's identity and self-perception. Taking into account the wide literature about psychological aspects before and after heart transplant, it clearly emerges that there is a lack of data and results for patients up to implantation of ventricular assist devices (VAD). The aim of the present study was to explore quality of life and factors correlated with psychological adjustment in patients supported with VAD.
  
  METHODS:
  From February 2013 to August 2014, 18 patients (17 male, mean age 57 years) under clinical evaluation before and after VAD implantation were enrolled. During interviews, patients were assessed with EuroQoL-5D questionnaire to monitor improvement of quality of life before implantation and at 3 and 6 months; critical issues, needs and point of views of patients have been described.
  
  RESULTS:
  A significant improvement in the quality of life score was observed at 3 (score 38 [interquartile range 30-40] vs 75 [60-80], p<0.05) and 6 months (38 [30-40] vs 70 [60-80], p<0.05). Overall, patients' psychological state investigated by the test showed a clear and positive trend. All patients need to empower through complete information about the device, related risks and life expectancy. Interdisciplinary approach improved compliance with therapy.
  
  CONCLUSIONS:
  Successful treatment and efficient psychological care are closely related to assessment and continuous clinical support. This approach ensures a better selection of patients and improves their compliance. Further data are needed to support our preliminary observations and to explore long-term quality of life.
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• A prospective comparison of mid-term outcomes in patients treated with heart transplantation with advanced age donors versus left ventricular assist device implantation.
  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg

  2016 10;23(4):584-92. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivw164.
  
  Ammirati Enrico, Cipriani Manlio G, Varrenti Marisa, Colombo Tiziano, Garascia Andrea, Cannata Aldo, Pedrazzini Giovanna, Benazzi Elena, Milazzo Filippo, Oliva Fabrizio, Gagliardone Maria P, Russo Claudio F, Frigerio Maria
  
  Abstract
  
  OBJECTIVES:
  In Europe, the age of heart donors is constantly increasing. Ageing of heart donors limits the probability of success of heart transplantation (HTx). The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) treated with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) with indication as bridge to transplantation (BTT) or bridge to candidacy (BTC) versus recipients of HTx with the donor's age above 55 years (HTx with donors >55 years).
  
  METHODS:
  we prospectively evaluated 301 consecutive patients with advanced HF treated with a CF-LVAD (n = 83) or HTx without prior bridging (n = 218) in our hospital from January 2006 to January 2015. We compared the outcome of CF-LVAD-BTT (n = 37) versus HTx with donors >55 years (n = 45) and the outcome of CF-LVAD-BTT plus BTC (n = 62) versus HTx with donors >55 years at the 1- and 2-year follow-up. Survival was evaluated according to the first operation.
  
  RESULTS:
  The perioperative (30-day) mortality rate was 0% in the LVAD-BTT group vs 20% (n = 9) in the HTx group with donors >55 years (P = 0.003). Perioperative mortality occurred in 5% of the LVAD-BTT/BTC patients (n = 3) and in 20% of the HTx with donors >55 year group (P = 0.026). Kaplan-Meier curves estimated a 2-year survival rate of 94.6% in CF-LVAD-BTT vs 68.9% in HTx with donors >55 years [age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.81; P = 0.02 in favour of CF-LVAD]. Considering the post-HTx outcome, a trend in favour of CF-LVAD-BTT was also observed (age- and sex-adjusted HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.17-1.16; P = 0.09 in favour of CF-LVAD), whereas CF-LVAD-BTT/BTC showed a similar survival at 2 years compared with HTx with donors >55 years, both censoring the follow-up at the time of HTx and considering the post-HTx outcome.
  
  CONCLUSIONS:
  Early and mid-term outcomes of patients treated with a CF-LVAD with BTT indication seem better than HTx with old donors. It must be emphasized that up to 19% of patients in the CF-LVAD/BTT group underwent transplantation in an urgent condition due to complications related to the LVAD. At the 2-year follow-up, CF-LVAD with BTT and BTC indications have similar outcome than HTx using old heart donors. These results must be confirmed in a larger and multicentre population and extending the follow-up.
  
  © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Embolic myocardial infarction due to coronary artery aneurysm in a patient with Loeys-Dietz syndrome.
  EuroIntervention

  2016 May;12(1):61. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I1A11.
  
  Cereda Alberto, Garascia Andrea, Sormani Paola, Klugmann Silvio, Artioli Diana, Soriano Francesco, Oreglia Jacopo Andrea
  
  
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• [Endomyocardial biopsy should be performed in selected patients with suspected myocarditis].
  G Ital Cardiol (Rome)

  2015 Oct;16(10):539-43. doi: 10.1714/2028.22034.
  
  Ammirati Enrico, Cipriani Manlio, Bonacina Edgardo, Garascia Andrea, Oliva Fabrizio
  
  Abstract
  
  Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is the gold standard for the diagnosis of myocarditis. Patients with clinical presentation consistent with myocarditis and acute heart failure should undergo EMB, in particular to exclude giant-cell myocarditis or necrotizing eosinophilic myocarditis that are life-threatening conditions. The indication for EMB is debatable in case of suspected myocarditis with infarct-like presentation and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. In fact, in this group of patients the prognosis is fairly good, and the clinical advantage to reach a histological diagnosis by means of an invasive procedure with potential complications such as EMB is limited. In this article we discuss the indication for EMB in the light of current guidelines based on existing consensus documents.
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• CoreValve Evolut R implantation as valve-in-valve in an Edwards SAPIEN 3 to treat paravalvular regurgitation.
  EuroIntervention

  2015 Sep;11(5):e1. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I5A116.
  
  Bruschi Giuseppe, Soriano Francesco, Musca Francesco, Nava Stefano, Einaudi Arturo, Garascia Andrea, Belli Oriana, Barosi Alberto, Fratto Pasquale, Colombo Paola, Russo Claudio Francesco, Gagliardone Maria Pia, Klugmann Silvio
  
  
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Cardiogenic shock: How to overcome a clinical dilemma. Unmet needs in Emergency medicine.
  Int J Cardiol

  2015 ;186():19-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.02.111.
  
  Morici Nuccia, Sacco Alice, Paino Roberto, Oreglia Jacopo Andrea, Bottiroli Maurizio, Senni Michele, Nichelatti Michele, Canova Paolo, Russo Claudio, Garascia Andrea, Kulgmann Silvio, Frigerio Maria, Oliva Fabrizio
  
  
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Mid-term survival after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device versus heart transplantation.
  Heart Vessels

  2016 May;31(5):722-33. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0654-4.
  
  Ammirati Enrico, Oliva Fabrizio G, Colombo Tiziano, Russo Claudio F, Cipriani Manlio G, Garascia Andrea, Guida Valentina, Colombo Giulia, Verde Alessandro, Perna Enrico, Cannata Aldo, Paino Roberto, Martinelli Luigi, Frigerio Maria
  
  Abstract
  
  There is a paucity of data about mid-term outcome of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) treated with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in Europe, where donor shortage and their aging limit the availability and the probability of success of heart transplantation (HTx). The aim of this study is to compare Italian single-centre mid-term outcome in prospective patients treated with LVAD vs. HTx. We evaluated 213 consecutive patients with advanced HF who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implant or HTx from 1/2006 to 2/2012, with complete follow-up at 1 year (3/2013). We compared outcome in patients who received a LVAD (n = 49) with those who underwent HTx (n = 164) and in matched groups of 39 LVAD and 39 HTx patients. Patients that were treated with LVAD had a worse risk profile in comparison with HTx patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves estimated a one-year survival of 75.5 % in LVAD vs. 82.3 % in HTx patients, a difference that was non-statistically significant [hazard ratio (HR) 1.46; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.74-2.86; p = 0.27 for LVAD vs. HTx]. After group matching 1-year survival was similar between LVAD (76.9 %) and HTx (79.5 %; HR 1.15; 95 % CI 0.44-2.98; p = 0.78). Concordant data was observed at 2-year follow-up. Patients treated with LVAD as bridge-to-transplant indication (n = 22) showed a non significant better outcome compared with HTx with a 95.5 and 90.9 % survival, at 1- and 2-year follow-up, respectively. Despite worse preoperative conditions, survival is not significantly lower after LVAD than after HTx at 2-year follow-up. Given the scarce number of donors for HTx, LVAD therapy represents a valid option, potentially affecting the current allocation strategy of heart donors also in Europe.
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Levosimendan reverted severe pulmonary hypertension in one patient on waiting list for heart transplantation.
  Int J Cardiol

  2013 Oct;168(4):4518-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.106.
  
  Ammirati Enrico, Musca Francesco, Oliva Fabrizio, Garascia Andrea, Pacher Valentina, Verde Alessandro, Cipriani Manlio, Moreo Antonella, Martinelli Luigi, Frigerio Maria
  
  
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Limited changes in severe functional mitral regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension after left ventricular assist device implantation: a clue to consider concurrent mitral correction?
  Int J Cardiol

  2013 Jul;167(2):e35-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.03.098.
  
  Ammirati Enrico, Musca Francesco, Cannata Aldo, Garascia Andrea, Verde Alessandro, Pacher Valentina, Moreo Antonella, Oliva Fabrizio, Martinelli Luigi, Frigerio Maria
  
  
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• Heart transplantation: 25 years' single-centre experience.
  J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown)

  2013 Sep;14(9):637-47. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32835dbd74.
  
  Bruschi Giuseppe, Colombo Tiziano, Oliva Fabrizio, Botta Luca, Morici Nuccia, Cannata Aldo, Vittori Claudia, Turazza Fabio, Garascia Andrea, Pedrazzini Giovanna, Frigerio Maria, Martinelli Luigi
  
  Abstract
  
  OBJECTIVES:
  Heart transplantation (HTx) is still one of the most effective therapies for end-stage heart disease for patients with no other medical or surgical therapy. We report the results of our 25-year orthotropic HTx single-centre experience.
  
  METHODS:
  From November 1985, 905 orthotopic heart transplants have been performed at our centre. We exclude from the present analysis 13 patients who underwent re-transplantation and 14 pediatric cases (age at HTx <15 years).
  
  RESULTS:
  The present study collected the data of 878 primary adult orthotopic HTx performed at our centre. Mean age at HTx was of 49.6?±?11.6 years. Mean donor age was 36.9?±?14.8 years. Hospital mortality was 11.6% (102 patients), early graft failure was the principal cause of death (58 patients) followed by infections (18 cases) and acute rejection (7 patients). Overall actuarial survival was 78.1% at 5 years and 63.8% and 47.5%, respectively, at 10 and 15 years from HTx. Mean survival was 10.74 years; 257 late deaths were reported (33.1%); main causes were neoplasm in 83 patients, and cardiac causes included coronary allograft vasculopathy in 78 patients. Freedom from any infection at 5, 10 and 15 years was 52.2, 44.1 and 40.1%, respectively. Freedom from rejection at 5 years was 36.2%, with 493 patients experiencing at last one episode of rejection, the majority occurring during the first 2 months after transplantation. The long-term survival of HTx recipients is limited in large part by the development of coronary artery vasculopathy and malignancies. In our experience freedom from coronary allograft vasculopathy at 10 years was 66.9%, and 85 patients underwent percutaneous coronary revascularization. In our study population, 44 patients experienced posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder and 91 patients experienced a solid neoplasm, mean survival free from neoplasm was 12.23 years.
  
  CONCLUSION:
  Over the past four decades the field of HTx has evolved considerably, with improvements in surgical techniques and postoperative patients' care. A careful patient selection and treatment of candidates for transplantation as well as accurate clinical follow-up combined with real multidisciplinary teamwork that involved different heart failure specialists, allowed us to obtain our excellent long-term results.
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• [What's essential, what's useful and what's superfluous in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy].
  Ital Heart J

  2005 May;6 Suppl 2():28S-34S.
  
  Frigerio Maria, Garascia Andrea, Foti Grazia, Masciocco Gabriella, Distefano Giada, Roubina Elena, Resta Davide
  
  
  
  Guarda su PubMed

• [Advanced heart failure: therapeutic options. Opinion of the surgeon cardiologist].
  Ital Heart J

  2002 Oct;3 Suppl 6():65S-70S.
  
  Bruschi Giuseppe, Colombo Tiziano, Garatti Andrea, Fratto Pasquale, Ribera Elena, Garascia Andrea, Oliva Fabrizio, Frigerio Maria, Vitali Ettore
  
  
  
  Guarda su PubMed